Scoring Quality - Exterview

Purpose

Consistent scoring is what makes an evaluation defensible. These practices keep scores comparable across candidates and reviewers.

Define what each score level means so reviewers apply it the same way.

The same inputs should produce the same score, regardless of who reviews.

Send borderline candidates to human review instead of forcing a score.

Check that scores still predict what actually matters after hire.

Scoring Rubrics. Structured dimensions, configured once and applied consistently.
Calibration. Versioned scoring so results stay reproducible over time.
Auditability. Every score traces to the rubric version and the reviewer behind it.

#	Confirm
1	Criteria are defined for each rubric dimension.
2	Reviewers understand the rubric.
3	Reports are reviewed consistently.
4	Exceptions are escalated, not absorbed.
5	Outcomes are monitored over time.

How do we keep two reviewers consistent?

Shared rubrics with clear level definitions, plus calibration so the same inputs score the same way.

What should we do with borderline candidates?

Escalate them for human review rather than forcing a score. Consistency comes from process, not rounding.

Does Exterview expose the exact weights?

No. The methodology is explained; the specific weights and thresholds stay in your signed configuration.