Skip to main content

​
Purpose

The questions that come up in every serious evaluation, answered directly.
ATS AI is built to move candidates through a pipeline, not to evaluate them to your bar. Exterview adds org-specific, reproducible evaluation, with an Upcoming post-hire loop, on top of the ATS you already run, the two are complementary.
Exterview layers above your stack and integrates through standard connectors. Your data is yours, exportable, and specific to your organization. The value that accrues, your calibration, belongs to you.
Role-relevant rubrics applied consistently, content-based scoring (not face, tone, or biometrics), explainable results, and mandatory human review. See Responsible AI.
No. Exterview produces decision support; a human always owns the outcome. No fully autonomous adverse decision is made.
You can build a prompt; the hard part is reproducible, versioned, per-customer calibration, a set of specialized agents, governance and, Upcoming, a closed post-hire loop, sustained over time. That’s the system Exterview is.
Specific to your organization, encrypted, and never pooled into a shared model or sold. Configurable retention policies are still being finalized. See Privacy & Residency.
A skills graph is one static model served to everyone. Exterview calibrates to your organization and compounds with your outcomes, the advantage is yours, not the vendor’s.